Cases 81 - 90 of 589
Elliott v. Google, Inc.
as 4:2012cv02575
Plaintiff:
David Elliott
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Pet Head Inc et al v. Skaffles Group LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04519
Defendant:
Does, E S Sutton Inc, Fetch For Cool Pets LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kyara Mascolo and Pet Head Inc
Southern California Darts Association v. Southern California Darts Association Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01899
Defendant:
Does, Southern California Darts Association Inc and Dino M Zaffina
Plaintiff:
Southern California Darts Association
F.E.A., Inc. v. Does et al
as 1:2012cv03999
Plaintiff:
F.E.A., Inc.
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
as 4:2012cv02488
Plaintiff:
Monster Cable Products Inc
Defendant:
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chanel, Inc. v. acheterluxechanel.com et al
as 1:2012cv21856
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
acheterluxechanel.com, chanel76.com, chanelbags-jp.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. chanel255.org et al
as 1:2012cv21762
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
chanel255.org, chanel-replica.us, fakechanel.us and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Adidas America, Inc et al v. Seven Wells, LLC
as 3:2012cv00859
Plaintiff:
Adidas America, Inc and adidas AG
Defendant:
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, Seven Wells, LLC and World Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. bagshug.com et al
as 1:2012cv21733
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
bagshug.com, cheapmarcjacobsbags.com, designerbaghub.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Otter Products LLC v. One Click Enterprises 1 Inc et al
as 2:2012cv04193
Defendant:
Does, One Click Enterprises 1 Inc and Igor Zomin, Jr
Plaintiff:
Otter Products LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
