Cases 61 - 70 of 237,651
Random Chat, LLC v. Big Lots Stores, LLC
as 2:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Random Chat, LLC
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Torus Ventures LLC v. Ethos Group Holdings, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00581
Defendant:
Ethos Group Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Torus Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Random Chat, LLC v. BPS Direct, LLC d/b/a Bass Pro Shops
as 7:2024cv00174
Defendant:
BPS Direct, LLC d/b/a Bass Pro Shops
Plaintiff:
Random Chat, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, v. APPLE INC.
as 7:2024cv00232
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Plaintiff:
COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCP IP, LLC v. Velocity Outdoor Inc.
as 1:2024cv00863
Defendant:
Velocity Outdoor Inc.
Plaintiff:
MCP IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Fotohaus, LLC v. Cresta Bledsoe Studio LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00745
Defendant:
Cresta Bledsoe Design, LLC, Cresta Bledsoe Studio LLC, Cresta Bledsoe Fine Jewelry, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Fotohaus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Andrew Blair Bailie v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv06456
Plaintiff:
Andrew Blair Bailie
Defendant:
ZHUyi, liufengjingyingbu and Defendant no. 2
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv05663
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Association
as 3:2024cv06579
Defendant:
Northern California Golf Association
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Viral DRM LLC v. Tyeson et al
as 3:2024cv06597
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM LLC
Defendant:
Network Ten Pty Ltd and Cameron Tyeson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
