Cases 101 - 110 of 6,065
Tejon v. Up Faith & Family, LLC
as 1:2023cv24660
Plaintiff:
Roger Tejon
Defendant:
Up Faith & Family, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tejon v. Cineverse Entertainment Corp.
as 1:2023cv24684
Plaintiff:
Roger Tejon
Defendant:
Cineverse Entertainment Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States v. Rogers
as 23-7089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY DEWAYNE ROGERS
Ferran v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01220
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Ferran, III
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Neil Mitchill, Anthony F. O'Brien and others
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Keritsis v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01351
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Gregory Hayes, Tracy A. Atkinson, Leanne G. Caret and others
Tejon v. CuriosityStream, Inc.
as 1:2023cv24658
Plaintiff:
Roger Tejon
Defendant:
CuriosityStream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-299
Petitioner:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-302
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Petitioner:
ACCENTURE LLP
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
