Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated v. Carrie Riley
as 2:2016cv04973
Defendant:
Carrie Riley
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. et al
as 2:2015cv06210
Defendant:
Gregory L. Armstrong, Barclays Capital Inc., Victor Burk and others
Plaintiff:
Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund
Robert Yates v. Municipal Mortgage & Equity
as 12-2496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT YATES, MJG-08-269, ALAN S. BARRY, MJG-08-269, DAVID YOUNG, MJG-08-269 and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK K. JOSEPH
Plaintiff:
F. RICHARD MANSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated MJG-08-269, GEETA SHAILAM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated MJG-08-386, MICHAEL J. CIRRITO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated MJG-08-476 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE & EQUITY, LLC, MELANIE M. LUNDQUIST, MICHAEL L. FALCONE and others
Merrill Lynch Pierece Fenner and Smith Incorporated v. Ronald Anglin
as 2:2012cv01155
Defendant:
Ronald Anglin
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated v. Rodel Corriente
as 2:2011cv10660
Respondent:
Rodel Corriente
Petitioner:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated
US Dept. of HUD v. Antonio Fulgham
as 11-2322
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTONIO FULGHAM
Defendant - Appellant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BALTIMORE CITY
Garnishee - Appellee:
THE TOWNER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION OF MARYLAND, MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER AND SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi et al v. Merrill Lynch and Co Inc et al
as 8:2011cv01581
Plaintiff:
Connecticut Carpenters Annuity Fund, Connecticut Carpenters Pension Fund, Iron Workers Local No 25 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Donald C Han, Michael M McGovern, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Inc and others
Robert J Coffey v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv05860
Plaintiff:
Robert J Coffee and Robert J Coffey
Defendant:
Does, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch and Co Inc
The Mills Corporation Securiti
as 10-1150
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Appellant:
DANIEL ROCKER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - None:
KENNETH R. PARENT, NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Appellee:
JEFFREY WARREN GOLAN, JEFFREY ALAN BARRACK, CHAD A. CARDER and others
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
The Mills Corporation Securiti v. Kenneth Parent
as 10-1125
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD STANLEY, JOAN KLOC and MARVIN MINE
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH R. PARENT
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM, JOSEPH B. GILDENHORN and others
Defendant - None:
COLOMBE M. NICHOLAS, CHARLES R. BLACK, S. JOSEPH BRUNO and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
