Cases 21 - 30 of 225
Carlisle v. NantKwest, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, NantKwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Shenk v. NantKwest, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00871
Defendant:
NantKwest, Inc., Cheryl Cohen, Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shenk
Gross v. Nantkwest, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv00223
Defendant:
Nantkwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong, ImmunityBio, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Gross
Franchi v. Nantkwest, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv00218
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyck, Nantkwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Weiss v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Nantkwest, Inc., Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Annie Weiss
Leaman v. NantKwest, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01351
Defendant:
NantKwest, Inc., Cheryl Cohen, Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Leaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 sv
Hargett v. NantKwest, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Patrick Soon-Shiong, ImmunityBio, Inc., Michael Blaszyk and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hargett
Gary Alexander, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 21-15194
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GARY ALEXANDER, on his own behalf and on behalf of his beneficiary son, Jordan Alexander, CORINNA KLEIN and DAVID HAFFNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DRISCOLL
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS (AHIP), SECRETARY OF LABOR, NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM, et al. and others
Martin v. Salem Police Department, et al
as 21-1004
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH H. TURIEL, ELAINE MILO, ARTHUR C. SARENT, III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD B. MARTIN, JR.
Brian Driscoll v. MetLife Insurance Company, et al
as 20-56391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN JOSEPH DRISCOLL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC., JOHN DOES and METLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
