Cases 21 - 30 of 944
USA v. Homero Navarro
as 23-6063
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HOMERO QUINTANILLA NAVARRO
Marielena Gomez-Navarro, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13864
Petitioner:
MARIELENA GOMEZ-NAVARRO and JOSE ANIEL GOMEZ-NAVARRO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Saldivar-Navarro
as 23-50765
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Johel Saldivar-Navarro, also known as Franklin Zaldivar-Navarro, also known as Franklin Johel Zaldivar, also known as Osman Murillo, also known as Franklin Onasis Navarro, also known as Franklin Saldivar, also known as Franklin Joel Saldivar
USA v. Saldivar-Navarro
as 23-50764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Johel Saldivar-Navarro
RODRIGUEZ NAVARRO v. COINBASE, INC.
as 1:2023cv23757
Plaintiff:
PABLO RODRIGUEZ NAVARRO
Defendant:
COINBASE, INC.
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Navarro v. Beard et al
as 1:2023cv08174
Plaintiff:
Cristian Navarro
Defendant:
Gregory A. Beard, Ricardo Larroude, William B. Spence and others
Nominal Defendant:
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Segundo Navarro Drilling, Ltd. v. San Roman Ranch Mineral Partners, Ltd.
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Segundo Navarro Drilling, Ltd.
Defendant:
San Roman Ranch Mineral Partners, Ltd.
Perez-Marquez v. Lumbardo, et al.
as 23-2106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSCAR PEREZ-MARQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LUMBARDO, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
