Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Corporate Auto Resource Specialist, LTD v. Suburban Motors Company, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10452
Defendant:
Brian Blankenship, Laura Ann Blankenship, Suburban Motors Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Corporate Auto Resource Specialist, LTD
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
URS Midwest, Inc. et al v. Mega Buck Resources et al
as 2:2016cv14018
Plaintiff:
URS Midwest, Inc. and United Road Logistics LLC
Defendant:
Mega Buck Resources and Steven Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carter v. H&M Demolition Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. Carter
Defendant:
H&M Demolition Companies, Inc., Ludington, City of, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Concerned Pastors for Social Action et al v. Khouri et al
as 2:2016cv10277
Plaintiff:
Concerned Pastors for Social Action , Melissa Mays , American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan and others
Defendant:
Nick A. Khouri , Frederick Headen , Michael A. Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
