Cases 51 - 60 of 1,349
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 21-40820
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eynel Guzman
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-20583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, State of Texas and Ken Paxton
Flores v. Lumpkin
as 21-20579
Petitioner / Appellant:
Fidel Flores
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Purdy v. Lumpkin
as 21-11090
Petitioner / Appellant:
George Edward Purdy
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Malone v. Zambrano
as 21-40807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aaron Malone
Defendant / Appellee:
Kristine Zambrano, Sergeant/Lieutenant McConnell Unit Prison, Kenneth Putnam, Warden, McConnell Unit Prison, Major Gould, Major/Lieutenant McConnell Unit Prison and others
Ford v. Lumpkin
as 21-20575
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lee Ford
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 21-40809
Petitioner / Appellant:
Johnny Lee Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv03525
Defendant:
Raymond Charles Bailey, Jr., Bryan Collier, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Incorrectly Filed.
as 4:2021cv03523
Petitioner:
Raymond Charles Bailey, Jr. and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Patrick Cooper and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Battles v. Lumpkin
as 21-40794
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steve Battles
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
