Cases 1 - 10 of 197,852
Peterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv03497
Defendant:
3M Company, Chemours Company, The and EIDP, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paul Sadeghi and Vicki Peterson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hardwick v. 3M Company et al
as OHS/2:24-cv-03121
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Hardwick
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP, INC. fka E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY and The Chemours Company
City Utilities of Springfield, MO v. 3M Company
as 6:2024cv03164
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
City Utilities of Springfield, MO
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Breckenridge et al v. The 3M Company et al
as NYS/1:24-cv-05214
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Breckenridge, Barry Briggs, Alfred Brindisi and others
Zynda et al v. Price et al
as ALN/2:24-cv-00867
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Zynda, Jose L Lopez, Guadalupe Lopez, IV and others
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as ALN/2:24-cv-00869
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Dixon, Robert Alexander, Kevin Alexander and others
Shirley v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:24-cv-02904
Plaintiff:
Cathy Shirley
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc
Gehm v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:24-cv-02909
Plaintiff:
Jack Frederick Gehm
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Branch v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:24-cv-02899
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Branch
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Choate v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:24-cv-02902
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Choate
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
