Cases 1 - 10 of 1,571
CRAWFORD
as 1:2024cv02675
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Walker v. Adams, et al.
as 24-4741
Defendant:
OLIVER, Sgt., Deputy LY, Nurse ALEX DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Walker and JEFFERY WALKER
Crawford v. National Security Agency et al
as 2:2024cv12008
Plaintiff:
Anitra Elaine Crawford
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Karras Bey et al v. Mayes et al
as 2:2024cv11923
Defendant:
7th Circuit Court, Genesee County Jail, Michigan State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Alaiza Sandra Maldonado El and Steven Strat Karras Bey
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Benshoof, et al. v. Admon, et al.
as 24-4223
Defendant:
BLAIR RUSS, WILLIE GREGORY, MAGALIE LERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
BRIANA GAGE and KURT BENSHOOF
Doe LS 340, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
as 24-4145
Respondent:
JESSICA FRESHWATER, V.R., KELLY COWSERT and others
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Crawford v. Neighbors Building Neighborhoods, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Crawford
Defendant:
Melony Carey and Neighbors Building Neighborhoods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crawford v. United Payment Center Inc.
as 7:2024cv04952
Plaintiff:
Tanya S. Crawford
Defendant:
United Payment Center Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
