Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 641
Amelio v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 24-1619
Plaintiff: ALFONSO AMELIO, CARMINE AMELIO and CLEMENTE AMELIO
Defendant: QUICKEN LOANS, INC., FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, MCABE, WESIBURG & CONWAY, P.C. and others
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant: JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06494
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Conway
as 24-7045
Petitioner: In re: JAMES CONWAY
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES
USA v. Donald Conway
as 24-5482
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DONALD R. CONWAY
Wynter v. ARCA Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01418
Plaintiff: Dianah Wynter
Defendant: ARCA Biopharma, Inc., Robert E. Conway, Linda Grais and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Alliance of Health Care Sharing Ministries v. Colorado Division of Insurance et al
as 1:2024cv01386
Plaintiff: Alliance of Health Care Sharing Ministries
Defendant: Colorado Division of Insurance and Michael Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZHONG et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2024cv01136
Petitioner: FEIFEI ZHONG and YILIAN LI
Respondent: UR M. JADDOU, CORLISS A JOSEPHS-CONWAY and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff: KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant: ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?