Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WHITE v. DUNKIN' BRANDS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv16443
Defendant:
CARL SPARKS, MICHAEL HINES, DAVID HOFFMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC WHITE
KONG v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05970
Defendant:
IRENE R. MILLER, BRIAN M. LEVITT, MARK L. MITCHELL and others
Petitioner:
YAN SIONG KONG
DIRAUF et al v. BERGER et al
as 2:2020cv05601
Plaintiff:
ANNY HANISCH, WALTER SCHMIDT, LUDWIG DIRAUF and others
Defendant:
MACARTHUR PLAZA, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INDUSTRIAL AVENUE INVESTORS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, CARLSTADT BUILDING ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LITWIN v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03569
Defendant:
IRENE R. MILLER, BRIAN M. LEVITT, JOSEPH H. MOGLIA and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LITWIN
ROTH v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03425
Defendant:
IRENE MILLER, JOSEPH H. MOGLIA, ALLAN R. TESSLER and others
Plaintiff:
MARC ROTH
Kirschner et al v. McClain et al
as 2:2020cv01768
Defendant:
Gerald C. Crotty, Pamela M. Paul, Suzanne Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Marc S. Kirschner and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
LIN v. SCHILLER, KNAPP, LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL, LLP
as 2:2017cv05511
Plaintiff:
IRENE LIN and JAY LIN
Defendant:
SCHILLER, KNAPP, LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL, LLP, HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, M&T BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DASH v. ABERCAUPH et al
as 1:2016cv00759
Plaintiff:
ADAM MEREDITH DASH
Defendant:
IRENE ABERCAUPH, RICHARD M COHEN, RHONDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
