Cases 141 - 150 of 38,949
Nielsen v. Regal Cinemas Inc
as 3:2024cv01774
Defendant:
Regal Cinemas Inc
Plaintiff:
Junious Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Jenkins v. Marriott Hotel
as 3:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jenkins
Defendant:
Marriott Hotel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stafford v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv00779
Defendant:
Austin Police Dept. Chief, Austin Court Commissioners, Kirk Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Germane Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, et al., v. USA, et al.
as 4:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, Others Unknown and Ajide Technology Corporation
Defendant:
USA, Sean Jeffrey Taylor, Jason Rennie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Prosper v. County
as 4:2024cv02550
Defendant:
Harris County and CITY OF HOUSTON
Plaintiff:
Robert Prosper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01760
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Scott v. United States Postal Service, San Marcos, TX
as 1:2024cv01042
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, San Marcos, TX
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02569
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
