Cases 11 - 20 of 779
Love v. Kirby et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Love
Defendant:
Dane Kirby, Sgt. Kacy Godsey, Sgt. Katie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seal v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seal
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erickson v. Barmettler et al
as 1:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Erickson
Defendant:
Officer Jesse Barmettler and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Streiff v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daniel Streiff
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Reynolds v. Minter et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Terry Darnell Reynolds
Defendant:
Roy Mintor, Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department, Vincent Pelligrini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lee v. Henry County et al
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Phillip Avery Lee
Defendant:
Henry County, Reginald Scrandrett and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Harris v. Rentz et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tremar Harris
Defendant:
Officer William Rentz and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
