Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Dickerson v. Ninth Judical Circuit Court, The et al
as 2:2010cv02303
Plaintiff:
Ismail Dickerson
Defendant:
Ninth Judical Circuit Court, The, R Markley Dennis, Jr, Charleston County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian Methodist Episcopal Church et al v William Booker et al
as 4:2010cv02116
Plaintiff:
Christian Methodist Episcopal Church, The and Atlantic Beach CME Mission Church, The
Defendant:
William Booker, Charlene Taylor, Josephine Isom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Lewis et al
as 3:2008cv02991
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles L Lewis, Bradley, Lynchburg, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 4:2008cv02726
Plaintiff:
Brad R Johnson
Defendant:
Lewis V Hall, Doris Cubitt, A Able and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv02963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gibson v. Charleston County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv01364
Plaintiff:
Tessa Rani Gibson
Defendant:
Charleston County Detention Center, Mark A Lewis, Donald V Salters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
