Cases 51 - 60 of 17,673
Gibson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2024cv02354
Plaintiff:
Terrell Gibson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fischiettie v. Shelby County, Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Jontae Aron Austin Fischiettie
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Byrum v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Byrum
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee, Glenn Jacobs, Tom Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Goode v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Leah Goode
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fox et al v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Troy J Fox and Jeanene Fox
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Maxwell Grayson Laughter, Town of Parrottsville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wiser v. Knox County, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Donald Wiser
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roane Central Utility District v. City of Harriman, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Roane Central Utility District
Defendant:
City of Harriman, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
