Cases 61 - 70 of 47,065
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
CASTOR v. GALICH et al
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CASTOR
Defendant:
OFFICER DUSTIN GALICH, OFFICER JARRET KASPRYSZYN, OFFICER JOSHUA STEGENA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SHENK v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 2:2024cv02458
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS, AMY L. SHENK, JANE & JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
N.B. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01474
Plaintiff:
N.B.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, VALERIE ARKOOSH and Phoenix House, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sollenberger v. Varner et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Alan Sollenberger
Defendant:
D. Varner, Emily Walker, Robert Mariani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
