Cases 121 - 130 of 291
COLEMAN v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 3:2015cv03539
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant:
ADAMS SCHNEIDER, JASON ROEBUCK, NICHOLAS ROMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASSETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv02074
Petitioner:
RONALD B. BASSETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JANSSEN v. REILLY et al
as 2:2015cv01906
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P JANSSEN
Defendant:
JOSEPH B REILLY and PISCATAWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAPLAN v. PITALE et al
as 2:2015cv01726
Plaintiff:
RICHARD P. KAPLAN
Defendant:
MARGHERITA A. PITALE, LISA M. VIGNUOLO, ESQ., TIMOTHY J. DEY, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCKETT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv01196
Petitioner:
MOSES B LOCKETT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ROBERT BUECHELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAPLAN v. MILLER et al
as 1:2014cv07307
Plaintiff:
RICHARD P. KAPLAN
Defendant:
THOMAS MILLER, FREDERICK W. KLEPP, MARGHERITA A. PITALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USERY v. WOOD et al
as 3:2014cv06346
Plaintiff:
DANA A. USERY
Defendant:
OTIS L. WOOD, J. STEWART, D. WYLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2014cv05202
Plaintiff:
EDWARD B. HOLLAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. NEUHAUSER et al
as 2:2014cv04794
Petitioner:
AARON THOMAS
Respondent:
GREGORY R. NEUHAUSER, Dale A. Meisel, JOHN J. HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
