Cases 131 - 140 of 10,881
Loftis v. Conway
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Cody Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston, Aaron J Livingston doing business as Gtwo also known as Clarke and Clarke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Tulsa Police Department and Police/Fire/Emergency Dispatch - 911
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. SSI Disability et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis
Defendant:
SSI Disability and ODOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bear Walker
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carshall v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Billy Carshall
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
David L Daniels
Respondent:
FNU Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Buss et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Channen Ray Ozell Smith
Defendant:
David Buss, Getner Drummond and Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan et al v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Kirk Brogie, Ernest Draper and others
Respondent:
Joseph Biden and David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Green v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Anthony Ryan Green
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
