Cases 11 - 20 of 323
Vaughn v. Klaflin et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daryl B. Vaughn
Defendant:
Tim Klaflin, Charlie Dixon and James Halbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Drew v. Trate
as 2:2023cv02494
Petitioner:
Robert Drew
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortiz v. Cathey et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Emilio Ortiz
Defendant:
R Cathey and B Brockwel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tims v. Garland
as 2:2023cv02248
Petitioner:
William Tims
Respondent:
U.S.A. and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Criss et al
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael R Smith
Defendant:
Nurse Criss, B Oham and Knox County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Beadle v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2023cv02085
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Beadle
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Officer FNU Hilson, Doctor C. Gatewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Javonte Davis
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Morgan County Correctional Complex, Stacey Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lurry v. Shelby County Justice Center et al
as 2:2022cv02795
Plaintiff:
Corey Deshun Lurry
Defendant:
Shelby County Justice Center, A. Moore, B. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Page et al
as 3:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
David A. Avery
Defendant:
Roger A. Page, D. Michael Swiney, Arnold B. Goldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
