Cases 11 - 20 of 1,247
BEY v. AMOROSO et al
as 2:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
RESHAN SAVAGE BEY
Defendant:
AYLSSA AMOROSO, SGT. POLICE OFFICER BRYAN CARNEY, ANTHONY MICHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: ANTHONY YORGEY
as 5:2024cv01748
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY YORGEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS, JERRY M. HOBECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. WELLPATH LLC
as 2:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
GARNET SMITH
Defendant:
WELLPATH, L.L.C., DR. SAEED BAZEL, DR. ANTHONY LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
SCOTT ANTHONY
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sides v. Miller
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sides
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOMACK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WOMACK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, YVONNE RUIZ, JOSEPH WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenyon v. Guiteriez et al
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kenyon
Defendant:
Dr. Julian Guiteriez, Dr. Shaihk Arif, Patricia Comer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
