Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Floyd v. Shelby County Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
Davey Floyd
Defendant:
Shelby County Tennessee Government, WellPath, LLC, Reginald Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishop v. Rhoades et al
as 3:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynn Bishop
Defendant:
Dusty Rhoades, Capt. f/n/u Youker, Sgt. f/n/u Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Williams, MD
as 1:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Mayes
Defendant:
Dr. Kenneth Williams, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Hininger et al
as 1:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Milton Keith Perkins
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Dr. f/n/u Hancock, John Doe, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barcus v. Keeble et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Trevon S Barcus
Defendant:
Dr Keeble, Melissa Federici and Tom Spangler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pasquini v TDOC et al.
as 3:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Bryan Pasquini
Defendant:
TDOC, Centurion CEO and Dr. Okuma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamby, Jr. v. McGruder et al
as 3:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. f/n/u McGruder, Mr. f/n/u Holloway, Dr. Molly O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keedy v. l/n/u et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Keedy
Defendant:
Mary l/n/u, Shawn Vanwinkle, Sharron Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02276
Plaintiff:
Quinterrion Gray
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. FBOP Director et al
as 2:2023cv02237
Plaintiff:
Lucas O. Thornton
Defendant:
FBOP Director, Warden Bowers, F/N/U Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
