Cases 11 - 20 of 32,931
Starks, Jr. v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Defendant:
Nehal Shah, Chadwick Dotson, Stephanie Vick and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malloy v. Leu
as 2:2024cv00574
Respondent:
D. Leu
Petitioner:
Ondrilleis June Malloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Helton v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00484
Defendant:
Gloria Kelley, Dreama Owens, Shawndell Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Nicole Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barksdale v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00649
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Barksdale
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Warden and Officers et al
as 7:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Chauncey D. Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Lt's., Warden and Officers, Mr. Tatum and Captain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Danville Police Department
as 7:2024cv00482
Defendant:
Danville Police Department
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Gonzalez et al
as 7:2024cv00646
Defendant:
Hearing Officer A.D. Gonzalez, Gregory Holloway, Lt. S. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Garrett
as 7:2024cv00647
Defendant:
Brady T. Garrett
Plaintiff:
Jullian A. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00645
Defendant:
Dr. B. Mullen and Med Staff
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
