Cases 21 - 30 of 1,708
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent:
PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. STAFF et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. STAFF and LECLARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CENTURION HEALTH, et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROJAE BROWN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, TEAH, JOHN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUNCH v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
DURWARD WILLIAM BUNCH, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL, TALBORT, CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Bill, Pully and others
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
