Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Turner v. Stewart, III
as 1:2011cv01263
Plaintiff: Charles R. Turner
Defendant: James Stewart, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv01217
Petitioner: Charles R. Turner
Respondent: Jean Johnson, Keith Davis, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv01085
Plaintiff: Charles R. Turner
Defendant: Jeane Johnson, Keith Davis, C.R.C Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv01086
Plaintiff: Charles R. Turner
Defendant: Gene Johnson, Kimberly Runion and The C.R.C. Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff et al v. Steward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00395
Plaintiff: Johnny R. Huff, Daryl Graves, Charles R. Turner and others
Defendant: Jim Steward, III, Kimberly Runion, Falcon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2011cv00375
Plaintiff: Charles R. Turner
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia and Jim Steward, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Herrick et al
as 1:2010cv00871
Plaintiff: Charles R. Turner
Defendant: Stephen M. Herrick, Decocci and Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Townsend et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00395
Plaintiff: Charles R. Riley
Defendant: J. R. Townsend, L. Jones and Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00304
Petitioner: Charles R. Barton, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bishop v. Davis
as 1:2007cv01121
Petitioner: Steven Thomas Bishop
Respondent: Charles R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?