Cases 31 - 40 of 3,225
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Defendant:
WARDEN Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
William Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Tampa
as 1:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
City of Tampa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Tariq D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young and Naylor Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. S. Young, Deputy Smith, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
