Cases 41 - 50 of 258
COUTINHO-SILVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv02898
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON JOSE COUTINHO-SILVA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PETTAWAY v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00072
Defendant:
MRS. ANDERSON and OFFICER CAMERON
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Anderson v. Shoaf et al
as 3:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Bennie Anderson
Defendant:
Doctors, Medical Personnel, and Employees of the J.C. Blair Hospital in Huntingdon, PA, M.D. Petz, J.C. Blair Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allam et al v. PA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv02131
Plaintiff:
John Anderson, Andrew Allam, Louis Looney and others
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corrections, PA Attorney General and PA Parole & Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Khox et al
as 3:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Larry Shaw, Juan Reyes, John Filer and others
Defendant:
Director, SCI-Dallas Security Administration, Superintendent Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, DR. KROSS, MS. BLAKELY and others
Plaintiff:
SAM DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HEAD v. CARR et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR., MICHAEL D. ANDERSON, CHARLES R. CARR, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. USA et al
as 2:2019cv01129
Defendant:
AGENT BLACK OH, CHEIF POLICE OF BRADDOCK, BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BURTON v. CLINGER et al
as 1:2019cv00222
Plaintiff:
DANTE BURTON
Defendant:
RHU SGT. CLINGER and MARY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DOE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00954
Defendant:
DAN HANCOCK, SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
