Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Scott v. Superintendent MCI Shirley
as 1:2015cv10826
Petitioner:
Robert Scott
Respondent:
MCI Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myers v. Middlesex County House of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv14107
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
Middlesex County House of Correction and Plymouth House of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv30181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Scott v. Diener et al
as 4:2014cv13159
Plaintiff:
Gary Scott
Defendant:
Robert B. Diener , Donald J. Hager , Linda Lee-Dynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12806
Plaintiff:
Scott Campbell
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doninque v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12792
Plaintiff:
Scott Doninque
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12746
Plaintiff:
Darryl Scott
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Massachusetts Department of Correction & All Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Matos et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts etal
as 1:2013cv12880
Plaintiff:
Justin De Matos
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police, Scott Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. MacEachern
as 1:2013cv12395
Plaintiff:
Mac Hudson and August Evan
Defendant:
Duane MacEachern, Scott Anderson, Keith Nano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Gelb
as 1:2013cv10306
Petitioner:
Darryl Scott
Respondent:
Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
