Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Krushin et al v. SCI - Waymart et al
as 4:2017cv01545
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Krushin, Ulysses Hoffman, John Doe and others
Defendant:
SCI - Waymart, Correct Health Care Administration, Sommers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitney v. Furgerson et al
as 3:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Charles Whitney
Defendant:
Furgerson, Myers, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOUNT v. DONATE et al
as 5:2017cv01511
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLOUNT
Defendant:
JANINE M. DONATE, LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, PACCHINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitney v. Fergerson et al
as 3:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Charles Whitney
Defendant:
T. Fergerson, Myers, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON v. COUNTY OF BUCKS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
FERNANDINO COLON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUCKS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOFFMAN HALL BUILDING B
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. FAYETTE CO. PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. RUSSELL
Defendant:
FAYETTE CO. PRISON , BRIAN MILLER , ROBERT MICHAEL, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bakhtiari v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Alireza Bakhtiari
Defendant:
Spaulding, Reedy, Hause and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOFFMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv03565
Petitioner:
MARCELLAS HOFFMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANDRE` MATEVOUSIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Buttolph v. PrimeCare Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Buttolph
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical Inc., Tanya Schisler and Carl A. Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., CARL A. HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
