Cases 41 - 50 of 50,388
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner:
Juan Tiburcio
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carrera II v. Mason et al
as 3:2024cv00986
Petitioner:
Alfred C. Carrera II
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: LUKE D. LATSON
as 2:2024cv02549
Plaintiff:
LUKE D. LATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRISON v. WASHINGTON
as 2:2024cv02531
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MORRISON
Respondent:
M WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: DAVID TURNER
as 2:2024cv02546
Petitioner:
DAVID TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRAYBOY v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Prime Care Medical
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Christine Gibbs
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GERMANY v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
TYRONE GERMANY
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, MICHELLE A. HENRY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
