Cases 51 - 60 of 1,173
Key v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jamie Key
Defendant:
J. B. Pritzker, Rob Jefferys, A. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv50083
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Defendant:
Officer J. Smith, Officer B. Disher, Inmate Artavis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Khan et al
as 1:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Sidney Walker
Defendant:
Dr. Khan, N.P. Lindgren, M. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivares Venegas v. McLean County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jonathan B Olivares Venegas
Respondent:
McLean County Sheriff Office and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
George v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Vincent M George, Jr.
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, William Loy, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivares Venegas v. Demoss et al
as 1:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Olivares Venegas
Defendant:
Dakota Demoss, Ronald Fryman, John Gaffney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Marquez et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Darius Welch
Defendant:
J. Marquez, B. Pitts, S. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Novy et al
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Jame B Novy and Jennifer Zyznar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talidis v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
James B Talidis
Defendant:
IDOC, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre, Dr. Larson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
