Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 51 - 60 of 44,803
Fenderson v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff: Amos Fenderson
Defendant: Payton Helfrich, Christian Munoz, Russell Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. United States
as 1:2024cv04528
Plaintiff: Glenn Bowen
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01402
Plaintiff: Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant: Anthony Wills and Officer Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff: Darryl Haslett
Defendant: John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff: Brandon Gully
Defendant: Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01405
Plaintiff: Mandela Jones
Defendant: Darren Galloway, Jon Loftos and Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03135
Plaintiff: Justin Snow
Defendant: Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franco v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01198
Plaintiff: Eduardo Franco
Defendant: Cherryle Hinthorne, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Springer et al
as 1:2024cv01199
Plaintiff: Darryl Haslett
Defendant: Josh Springer, Brett Hendricks, . Zanger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Wear et al
as 4:2024cv04097
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Carter
Defendant: . Wear and . Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?