Cases 51 - 60 of 50,119
Alfonso v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06341
Petitioner:
Santiago Alfonso
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutton v. Arroyo et al
as 2:2024cv03757
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Sutton
Defendant:
Sgt. Judy Arroyo, PO Ashley Raaf, PO Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Darnell Hicks
Defendant:
Captain Zimmerman, Ossining NY OVAC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 2:2024cv03645
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Groder and Dzurenda E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Biben et al
as 1:2024cv02731
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
Ellen Biben, Alonso Marisal Martinez, Trina Otha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Mason Jr. et al
as 9:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Paul Travis
Defendant:
Officer Mason Jr., Corporal Sanchez, Dr. Pathmalingam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. New York State
as 1:2024cv04012
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor
Defendant:
New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reshard v. City of New York Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv02531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reshard
Defendant:
City of New York Dept. of Correction, Captain Delosta, Officer Jane Doe#1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 6:2024cv06335
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wispe v. Toulon, Jr.
as 2:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Hernan Wispe
Defendant:
Errol D. Toulon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
