Cases 61 - 70 of 77,711
ALPHONSE v. WHITE et al
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP ALPHONSE
Defendant:
J WHITE, MATHEW BURDETT, ALLIGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crear v. Hunt et al
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Tiera Debriah Crear
Defendant:
FNU Hunt, FNU Rossitier and FNU Tosi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. LINER et al
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
DARIAN MAURICE WRIGHT
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN LINER and R QUINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
JOHN MOORE, III
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bittelman, Richard v. Weeks et al
as 0:2024cv60653
Plaintiff:
Richard Salvador Bittelman
Defendant:
Gordon Weeks, Wayne Ramelize and Broward Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Garcia v. Woods et al
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Misbel Rodriguez-Garcia
Defendant:
Billie Woods, FNU Santos and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick, Michael A. v. John Doe et al
as 2:2024cv14124
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Kendrick
Defendant:
John Doe and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
FREDERICK v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY FREDERICK, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LIBERTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY GENE MALONE
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
