Cases 61 - 70 of 32,508
Maxey v. Sivels et al
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Defendant:
Chap Sivels, Carpenter, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmuhl v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00375
Petitioner:
Andrew Gilbert Schmuhl
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutherford v. Haynes
as 7:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rutherford
Defendant:
Dr. Greg Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Darrell N. Watson
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Rick White, Captain Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeats v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Killian Yeats
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Brown, DDS, et al.
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
J. Brown, DDS and L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Van Huisen v. House of Representatives, et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Greg Van Huisen and Gregory Scott VanHuisen
Defendant:
House of Representatives, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo and Giovanni Janick Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
