Cases 71 - 80 of 920
Brooks v. Collier et al
as 5:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Sherman D. Brooks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Edmundo Cueto, Jr. and Cirildo Puente, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
David Wayne Black
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Bryan A Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tiede v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Bernhardt Tiede, II
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, The Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Kenneth Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Asst Warden Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael Doc Weaver
Defendant:
Jimmy Smith, David Reitsma, Tina S. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier
as 3:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Bryan A Smith
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
