Cases 1 - 10 of 702
Estes v. Missouri Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Estes
Defendant:
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eric S. Schmitt, Karen L. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Haper et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Terrique Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Haper, Unknown Womack, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Dartanyus C. Harris
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman-Bey v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Michael D Hendrickson, Michael L. Parson, Jeffrey Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leist v. Griffin et al
as 4:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Zachery Leist
Defendant:
Tyler Griffin, C. James and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. USA
as 3:2024cv05028
Petitioner:
Jason C. Russell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Corey C. Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Procedure for Removal Criminal Prosecutions
Mael v Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gordon Mael
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department, Robert A Martin, Chatham D Reeve and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bess
as 4:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Taiwansley C. Jackson
Respondent:
Douglas Burris and Kito Bess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
