Cases 1 - 10 of 62
HAIMANIO v. DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03827
Plaintiff:
APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO
Defendant:
DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MONICA PANOSIAN, GREGORY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00913
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SITZMANN v. USA
as 1:2021cv00851
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
GREGORY JOEL SITZMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROWN v. STROEBEL
as 1:2021cv00104
Respondent:
GREGORY JAMES STROEBEL
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BRADIN et al v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv03104
Respondent:
JACKSON, HOLST, WILBURN and others
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ROSS, RAYMOND GAJEWSKI, SCOTT HOWIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
