Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Neemann v. USA
as 8:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Gregory Neemann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cody v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gregory S. Cody
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fanter v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv03067
Petitioner:
Gregory William Fanter
Respondent:
United States of America and State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartunek v. USA
as 8:2021cv00467
Petitioner:
Gregory Bartunek
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03189
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Tyrrell v. Frakes et al
as 8:2021cv00210
Respondent:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Rosalyn Cotton, Scott Frakes and others
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyrrell v. Cotton et al
as 8:2019cv00386
Defendant:
Teresa Bittinger, Layne Gissler, Bob Twiss and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2019cv03083
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, City of Lincoln, City of Lincoln City Attorney's and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Adams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petersen v. Overstreet et al
as 8:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
David P. Peterson
Defendant:
Adam W. Overstreet, William Ryan Kennedy, Kristina Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrrell v. Frakes et al
as 8:2018cv00596
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Nebraska Parole Board and Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
Gregory B. Tyrrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
