Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Whitaker v. Boneberg et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jamison Whitaker
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg, Hope Sumrow, Robert Daniel Freisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Smith et al
as 9:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Russell Hope, Jr
Defendant:
Jason Smith, FNU Vincent, Christopher Lockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. TDCJ et al
as 6:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Parren Smith
Defendant:
TDCJ, TBCJ, J Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Ellis County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2022cv02478
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Chaney
Defendant:
Ellis County Sheriff Office, Wellpath to hope and healing, Terry NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2019cv01754
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, U.S. Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, New Hope Housing and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. McMullen et al
as 3:2018cv00432
Defendant:
Lt Phillip Graham, Kendrick Demyers, Allen Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
David George Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Texas Department of Correctional Justice
as 9:2018cv00176
Defendant:
Steven Edwards, Michael Davis, Donald Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpless v. Food Service et al
as 3:2018cv02216
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Food Service and Ark Hope (Transitonal House)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
