Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Martin v. Brott et al
as 0:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Julyen Alozno Martin
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Sherburne Jail Commander, Jail Captains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jidoefor v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2022cv02205
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu E. Jidoefor
Defendant:
Sherburne County, Joel Brott, Donald Starry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Husten v. Roy et al
as 0:2022cv01870
Plaintiff:
Michael John Husten
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Paul Schnell, Jeff Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aery v. Kasper et al
as 0:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
James Paul Aery
Defendant:
Tom Kasper, Troy Coyle and Beltrami County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brenizer et al v. The County of Sherburne et al
as 0:2021cv01301
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Mark Frittle, The County of Sherburne and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle-William: Brenizer, Travis R. Fairbanks, Johnnie L. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upsher v. Ten Unknown Named Agents/Officers
as 0:2019cv01805
Defendant:
Ten Unknown Named Agents/Officers, Eddie Miles, Kathy Halvorson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Upsher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Smith et al
as 0:2019cv00739
Plaintiff:
Mahdi H. Ali
Defendant:
Kathy Reid, Stephen Craane, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Quam et al
as 0:2019cv00670
Defendant:
Bruce Anderson, Bruce Rieser, Duane Quam and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Henry Carter, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Jeremy Schwartz, Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, Alice Remillard and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
