Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Hoffman v. Garza
as 4:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Tariq Hoffman
Respondent:
F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morrison v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Morrison
Defendant:
Kerry Hoffman, Donna Lash and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIGUEROA v. VALENTINE et al
as 5:2023cv02582
Plaintiff:
MARIO JOSE FIGUEROA and MARIO JESUS FIGUEROA
Defendant:
OFFICER VALENTINE, LIEUTENANT RINKER and CAPTAIN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
TELLY HARRIS
Defendant:
HILLARY BETH HOFFMAN, WARDEN OF ERIE COUNTY PRISON, DEPUTY WARDEN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWLEY v. HOFFMAN
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE ADRIAN CRAWLEY
Defendant:
C/O JOHN DOE HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2022cv00217
Petitioner:
TELLY HARRIS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AUBREA HAGERTY, HOFFMAN HILLARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMM v. ZAGORSKI et al
as 2:2021cv04806
Plaintiff:
ANCELL E. HAMM and ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Defendant:
CHARLES ZAGORSKI, WILLIAM BILLY LAMB, THOMAS L. WHITEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOFFMAN v. PISTRO
as 2:2021cv03007
Petitioner:
MARCELLAS HOFFMAN
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO and U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramey v. Marsh et al
as 4:2021cv01018
Defendant:
Dr. Kollman, Lt. Deloite, Captain Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLeon v. Marsh et al
as 1:2021cv00289
Defendant:
Kollman, A. Smith, Kelly Kephort and others
Plaintiff:
Malik E DeLeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
