Cases 1 - 10 of 3,517
IN RE: LUKE D. LATSON
as 9:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Luke D. Latson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. Bowman et al
as 4:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Jessie P. Skinner
Defendant:
Jevon Bowman, C. Alexander, James Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin B. Smith, Christopher M. Wiedau, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sherrill et al
as 7:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
McKenzie H. Sherrill, Bryan D. Reitsma and Kevin B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
