Cases 1 - 10 of 104,022
Parker v. Kitchen et al
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Clyde Joe Parker, II and Clyde Joe Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Danielle G Kitchen and Isabel Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv03543
Petitioner:
Tamara Dawn Allen
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall and C. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03548
Petitioner:
Rayford Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
John Eric Anderson
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera-Sustaita v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Herrera-Sustaita
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Aafia Siddiqui
Defendant:
Michael Smith, FNU Daniels, FNU McCullen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gonzales v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv00214
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Bruce Guadalupe Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clay v. Officr Leuerot et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James McDaniel Clay
Defendant:
Officr Leuerot and Officer Gonzles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farooq v. Prucka
as 3:2024cv02383
Defendant:
Susannah E Prucka
Plaintiff:
Asem Farooq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00125
Defendant:
CGO Administrator Jessica Riley, CO Francine Cromer, Senior Warden Jennifer S Cozby and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Westbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
