Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Spikes et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv05181
Plaintiff:
Leverne Spikes and Laura Spikes
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nalley v. Spike, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jeff Nalley
Defendant:
Spike, Inc. d/b/a Olympia Moving & Storage and Spike, Inc. doing business as Olympia Moving & Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Spikes v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 1:2023cv00200
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Janea Spikes
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v. Spike's Pub & Grub et al
as 3:2021cv01722
Plaintiff:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Spike's Pub & Grub d/b/a Vincint Von Hart LLC and Devin Elliot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spikes Trucking, Inc., LLC et al v. Spikes et al
as 2:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
Spikes Trucking, Inc., LLC, Stephanie Spikes and Ernest Spikes
Defendant:
Advantage One Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spikes v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
as 3:2017cv01516
Plaintiff:
Amos Spikes
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
SPIKES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SPIKES
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Spikes v. Chartis Claims Inc
as 3:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Willie Spikes and Willie Spikes
Defendant:
Chartis Claims Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
