Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Arnold v. Maple Leaf Farms Inc Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Brian Arnold
Defendant:
Maple Leaf Farms Inc Long Term Disability Plan and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Borgia, III et al
as 4:2019cv00040
Defendant:
James A. Diehl and Penny K. Diehl, as Co-Guardians of the persons and of the estates of Minors J.C.B. and T.J.B., Centier Bank as Trustee of the J & T Irrevocable Trust, Joseph C. Borgia, III. and others
Plaintiff:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood et al v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2015cv00260
Plaintiff:
Douglas R. Wood and Gregory S. Wood
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Click v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 4:2013cv00057
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Anthony Click
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Samaron Corp v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 3:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
Samaron Corp
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kumiega v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Kumiega
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOHE v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv00567
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN A YOHE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ERHART v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv00301
Counter Defendant:
NANCY ERHART
Plaintiff:
NANCY ERHART
Counter Claimant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
