Miller Act Cases
Five Rivers Carpenters, et al v. Covenant Construction Services, et al
as 23-3183
Plaintiff / Appellee: Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, and Royce Peterson and Mike Novy as trustees and Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Educational Trust Fund, and David Unzeitig and Robert Doubek as trustees
Defendant / Appellant: Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Type: Contract Miller Act
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Covenant Construction Services LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff: Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, Royce Peterson, Mike Novy and others
Defendant: Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
Type: Contract Miller Act
DB Peterson Company v. Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
as 8:2018cv01138
Plaintiff: DB Peterson Company
Defendant: Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Eastcoast Electric, LLC v. Peterson Affiliates, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv06033
Plaintiff: Eastcoast Electric, LLC
Defendant: Peterson Affiliates, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Panhandle Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Speegle Construction, Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv00933
Defendant: Speegle Construction, Inc., Adolfson Peterson Construction, LLC, Builder's Steel, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Panhandle Steel Erectors, Inc.
Cross_claimant: Lampson International, LLC
Cross_defendant: Adolfson Peterson Construction, LLC, Speegle Construction, Inc., Panhandle Steel Erectors, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Lampson International, LLC
Counter_defendant: Panhandle Steel Erectors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?