Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Kerr v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00350
Plaintiff:
John Kerr
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. , Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. v. Penn
as 1:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Oscar Penn
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2010cv08339
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Receiver:
Bart M. Schwartz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and BBVA Securities, Inc.
Interested Party:
Depository Trust Company, Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Cede & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. and Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Amicus Curiae:
Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs and The Clearing House Association L.L.C.
Special Master:
Daniel A. Pollack
Garnishee:
BASF Corporation
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
MPL SYSTEMS, INC. v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv05260
Plaintiff:
MPL SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and BANK OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chambers et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al
as 1:2010cv07109
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Chambers and John C Burnette
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., , Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated et al
as 3:2010cv04020
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin , David Norris and Frank Stone
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated , Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Brian Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated et al
as 4:2010cv04020
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin , David Norris and Frank Stone
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated , Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Brian Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King County Washington v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01156
Plaintiff:
King County Washington
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Money Markets, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blue Angel Capital I LLC v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2010cv04782
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Receiver:
Bart M. Schwartz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., BBVA Securities, Inc. and BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Interested Party:
Depository Trust Company, Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Cede & Co. and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Amicus Curiae:
Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs and The Clearing House Association L.L.C.
Special Master:
Daniel A. Pollack
Garnishee:
BASF Corporation
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Blue Angel Capital I LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Blue Angel Capital I LLC v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2010cv04101
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Receiver:
Bart M. Schwartz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., BBVA Securities, Inc. and BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Interested Party:
Depository Trust Company, Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Cede & Co. and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Amicus Curiae:
Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs and The Clearing House Association L.L.C.
Special Master:
Daniel A. Pollack
Garnishee:
BASF Corporation
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Blue Angel Capital I LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
