Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Brian Rausch v. Malcolm Blair et al
as 2:2015cv04212
Defendant:
Malcolm Blair, Does and Nolan McDonald
Plaintiff:
Brian Rausch
Xtreme Xperience, LLC v. Brown
as 1:2015cv04527
Plaintiff:
Xtreme Xperience, LLC
Defendant:
Nolan Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beasley v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
William Nolan Beasley, Sr
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs and Randy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
CLARK v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00287
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CLARK and ERIC NOLAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Nolan Estes v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 14-51103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOLAN ESTES
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Ascendant Renewable Energy Corporation v. Tang Energy Group Ltd et al
as 3:2014cv03314
Plaintiff:
Ascendant Renewable Energy Corporation
Defendant:
Tang Energy Group Ltd , Keith P Young , Mitchell W Carter and others
Counter_claimant:
Soaring Wind Energy LLC , Tang Energy Group Ltd , The Nolan Group Inc and others
Counter_defendant:
Ascendant Renewable Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Brian Zulli v. Los Robles Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv06444
Defendant:
Cedar's Sinai Medical Center, Does, Heritage Provider Network Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Zulli
Brian Zulli v. Los Robles Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv05030
Defendant:
Cedar's Sinai Medical Center, Does, Heriitage Provider Network Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Zulli
Estes v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 1:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Nolan Estes
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nolan v. Nationstar Morgage, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nolan
Defendant:
Nationstar Morgage, LLC and Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
