Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hrncir v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
City of Allen City Attorney's Office, Collin County Attorney's Office, Texas Department of Banking and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hrncir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Gwendolyn Hall et al v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2024cv03736
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall and Rashad K. Shabazz, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Social Security Administration, Apple Store and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Carr et al v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv02875
Plaintiff:
Brian P Carr, Rueangrong Carr and Buakhao Von Kramer
Defendant:
United States, US Department of Justice, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lynch v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Irene Lynch
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Brenda Phillips and Brenda C. Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, United States Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
SHANE v. THE UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 5:2019cv04831
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, LILLIAN RAIRIG and NANCY A BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
DR JOHN J. SHANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2007cv01910
Petitioner:
Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd., Blue Angel Capital I LLC and others
Appellant:
Origenes AFJP S.A., Arauca Bit AFJP S.A., Profesion+Auge AFJP S.A. and others
Interested Party:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Euro Bondholders, Banco Central de la Republica Argentina and others
Intervenor:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
NML Capital, Ltd.
Garnishee:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2006cv06466
Petitioner:
Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd., Blue Angel Capital I LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EM Ltd. and NML Capital, Ltd.
Interested Party:
Profesion+Auge AFJP S.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Banco Central de la Republica Argentina and others
Intervenor:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Appellant:
Administracion Nacional de Seguridad Social and Union de Administradoras de Fondos De Jubilaciones Y Pensiones, Arauca Bit AFJP S.A.Consolidar AFJP S.A., Futura AFJP S.A., Maxima AFJP S.A., Met AFJP S.A., Origenes AFJP S.A., Profesion+Auge AFJP S.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2007cv06563
Interested Party:
Profesion+Auge AFJP S.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Banco Central de la Republica Argentina and others
Petitioner:
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd., Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Blue Angel Capital I LLC and others
Intervenor:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
NML Capital, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Appellant:
Administracion Nacional de Seguridad Social and Union de Administradoras de Fondos De Jubilaciones Y Pensiones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2007cv02690
Appellant:
Met AFJP S.A., Origenes AFJP S.A., Arauca Bit AFJP S.A. and others
Interested Party:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund PLC, Banco Central de la Republica Argentina and others
Petitioner:
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd., Blue Angel Capital I LLC and Aurelius Capital Partners LP
Intervenor:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
NML Capital, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Banco De La Nacion Argentina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
